Look up from the screen for a moment.

Look at whatever is in front of you. A wall. A window. A room. Another person.

Notice that there is seeing happening.


Now ask: who is doing the seeing.


You will feel an instinct to point inward.

Behind the eyes. Somewhere in the head. A small you, sitting at a console, watching the screens that the eyes are providing.

This is the picture everyone carries.

Whether they have thought about it or not.


Look for the small you.


Not metaphorically. Literally.

Turn the attention around. Look behind the eyes.

What do you find.


You find sensations. The faint pressure of the eyes in their sockets. A vague hum of thought. Maybe a tightness somewhere.

You do not find a watcher.

You find more of what was being watched.


The room is in front of you. Sensations are behind the eyes. Both are objects of awareness.

Neither one is the one being aware.


Ramana spent his life pointing at this with a single instruction.

If you want to find the self, turn toward the source of the I-thought. Ask: to whom does this arise.

He was not asking for an answer. He was asking you to look, and to notice that the looker cannot be located.


The looker is the one thing you cannot find.

Everything else, you can find.

The wall. The thought about the wall. The sensation of looking. The sense that you are the one looking.

Each of these is an object.

The subject is not among them.


This is the strangest thing about your own experience and almost no one notices it.


You walk around assuming you are inside your head looking out.

You have never verified this. You could not verify it. There is no one in there to be verified.

The whole life you have lived has been lived from a position that, when you look for it, is not there.


Try again.

Look at your hand.

Now try to look at the one who is looking at the hand.


The looking can turn.

It can move from the hand to the thought of the hand to the sensation behind the eyes to the vague sense of being someone.

It can land anywhere it points.

It cannot land on itself.


The eye cannot see itself.

You have heard this line. You have heard it as a clever paradox.

It is not a paradox. It is a literal description of what happens when you try.


Douglas Harding noticed this in his thirties, walking in the Himalayas.

He realized that from where he was standing, there was no head on his shoulders. There was a vast openness, and the world appearing in it, and no observer to be found at the spot where the observer was supposed to be.

He spent the rest of his life inviting people to look for themselves.

Most people look and see what he saw.

Most people then go back to assuming there is someone there, because the assumption is older than the looking.


The assumption is older than the looking.

This is the problem.

You have been assuming a self behind the eyes for so long that the assumption feels like evidence.


It is not evidence. It is habit.

The habit is so smooth that the looking, when it disconfirms the habit, does not register.

You look, you do not find anyone, you go back to assuming someone is there.


Look again. Slower this time.


There is a wall.

There is seeing.

There is a sense that there is a seer.


The sense that there is a seer is not a seer.

It is a sense. It is another object.

A faint feeling, somewhere in the head, that there is someone here.

That feeling is not the someone. The feeling is what the someone was supposed to be backing up.


The feeling is the only one home.

And the feeling is not a person.


You can run this for hours and the result does not change.

Every time you turn to look for the looker, you find sensation, thought, awareness. You do not find an entity.


The relief in this is not immediate.

The relief comes later, when you realize that the entity you could not find was the one you had been trying to protect, defend, improve, and explain.

The entity that was never there does not need any of that.


The protection ends.

Not because you renounced it. Because there was never anyone to protect.


The Buddhists have a phrase. Empty of being just one thing.

They mean: when you look at the self, you do not find a thing. You find a process, a flow, a coming-and-going, no center.

This is not bad news. It is the only news there has ever been.

The self that is empty of being one thing is also empty of being a problem.


You stand up from the chair. You walk to the kitchen.

The walking happens. The body moves. The eyes see what they see.

No one is behind the eyes.


This was always the case.

You did not lose anyone.

You only stopped looking for someone who was never there.


Sources: Ramana Maharshi, Who Am I? and Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi (1955). Douglas Harding, On Having No Head (1961).

Back to the pointings